Cool -- looks good to me. I'm curious -- what impact does ramping have on quality for Vinyl Control?
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Owen Williams <email address hidden> wrote:
> Here's my fix -- I tested it with my usual stress-test tracks and it > sounded fine. It should ramp over 1ms no matter what sample rate. I'll > commit if you think it's ok. > > ** Patch added: "simple patch to change ramp durations" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/884567/+attachment/2581650/+files/ramp_1ms.diff > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx > Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884567 > > Title: > EngineBuffer ramp in and out interval is latency dependent > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/884567/+subscriptions >
Cool -- looks good to me. I'm curious -- what impact does ramping have on
quality for Vinyl Control?
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Owen Williams <email address hidden> wrote:
> Here's my fix -- I tested it with my usual stress-test tracks and it /bugs.launchpad .net/mixxx/ +bug/884567/ +attachment/ 2581650/ +files/ ramp_1ms. diff /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 884567 /bugs.launchpad .net/mixxx/ +bug/884567/ +subscriptions
> sounded fine. It should ramp over 1ms no matter what sample rate. I'll
> commit if you think it's ok.
>
> ** Patch added: "simple patch to change ramp durations"
>
> https:/
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx
> Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> EngineBuffer ramp in and out interval is latency dependent
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>