libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gcc-3.3 (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
gcc-3.3 (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
LaMont Jones |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #253059 http://
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : Bug #253059: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available | #1 |
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Arnaud Vandyck (avdyk) wrote : | #2 |
reassign 253059 gcc-3.3
retitle 253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 256978 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
thanks
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-
...
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib'
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-
..
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib/.'
Because of this, my package can not link to the correct libs. Thanks to
fix it ;-)
Cheers,
--
Arnaud Vandyck
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Arnaud Vandyck (avdyk) wrote : | #3 |
reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
merge 256978 253059
thanks
--
Arnaud Vandyck
< jaybonci> actually d-i stands for "divine intervention" ;)
-- in #debian-devel
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #4 |
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #253059 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #5 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:24:25 +0200
From: Vincent Lefevre <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
Package: libgtk2-java
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get dist-upgrade wants to remove packages depending on libgtk2-java,
but libgtk2-java can't be installed:
"apt-get install -t unstable libgtk2-java" gives:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgtk2-java: Depends: libgtk2-jni (= 2.6.0.1-3) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
and "apt-get install -t unstable libgtk2-jni" gives:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package libgtk2-jni is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package libgtk2-jni has no installation candidate
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-powerpc
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #6 |
Message-Id: <E1BfLBj-
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:10:27 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug #253059: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
retitle 253059 jar fails: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file
reassign 253059 kaffe
thanks
The problems you have are caused by automatic builds of java-gnome's
-jni packages failing on your architecture.
This is being caused (AFAIKT) by a failure in kaffe, so I'm reassigning
the report for now.
(cd build-java; \
/usr/bin/jar cf ../../lib/
`find -name "*.class"` )
/usr/lib/
make[3]: *** [../lib/gtk2.4.jar] Error 127
Full build log:
http://
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://
`- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:27:29 +0200
From: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
cc: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
Subject: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
--=-=-=
reassign 253059 gcc-3.3
retitle 253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 256978 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
thanks
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-
...
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib'
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-
..
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib/.'
Because of this, my package can not link to the correct libs. Thanks to
fix it ;-)
Cheers,
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBA4s3T4vz
BNGNq51r0Qge8g9
=QhAf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #8 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:41:04 +0200
From: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
--=-=-=
reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
merge 256978 253059
thanks
--
Arnaud Vandyck
< jaybonci> actually d-i stands for "divine intervention" ;)
-- in #debian-devel
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBA4tED4vz
ZKtPVSfb6+
=Z0eo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #9 |
*** Bug 6909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la | #10 |
clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
unmerge 253059
reassign 253059 libgtk2-java
reassign 256978 kaffe-pthreads
thanks
the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
dependency.
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for <email address hidden>:
>
> > reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug reassigned from package `kaffe-pthreads' to `gcc-3.3'.
>
> > merge 256978 253059
> Bug#253059: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Merged 253059 256978.
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to <email address hidden>
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact <email address hidden>
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Processed: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la | #11 |
clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libffi2-dev
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 253059 libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
retitle 256978 Lost dependencies on libgmp3 and libffi2
thanks
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #12 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:22:49 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>,
Debian GCC maintainers <email address hidden>(gcc-3.3 #253059 #256978),
<email address hidden> (Ean R. Schuessler) (kaffe-pthreads #256978)
Subject: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
unmerge 253059
reassign 253059 libgtk2-java
reassign 256978 kaffe-pthreads
thanks
the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
dependency.
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for <email address hidden>:
>
> > reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug reassigned from package `kaffe-pthreads' to `gcc-3.3'.
>
> > merge 256978 253059
> Bug#253059: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Merged 253059 256978.
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to <email address hidden>
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact <email address hidden>
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:38:48 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libffi2-dev
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 253059 libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
retitle 256978 Lost dependencies on libgmp3 and libffi2
thanks
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la | #14 |
Matthias,
When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
the bug.
From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
changes. This had the comment:
> the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> dependency.
Could you please explain that further.
The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
Why?
This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
more sense.
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://
`- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #15 |
Message-Id: <E1BgIUb-
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:29:15 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
Matthias,
When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
the bug.
From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
changes. This had the comment:
> the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> dependency.
Could you please explain that further.
The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
Why?
This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
more sense.
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://
`- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : | #16 |
Mark Howard writes:
> Matthias,
>
> When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
> explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
> the bug.
well, I renamed the report.
> >From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
> changes. This had the comment:
> > the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> > dependency.
>
> Could you please explain that further.
>
> The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
>
> Why?
> This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
> your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
>
> I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
> more sense.
/usr/lib/. and /usr/lib are both valid path names, even if you append
to it. I'll change that with the next upload, but IMO there is no
requirement that path names in these files have to be normalized.
Matthias
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #17 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:03:14 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
Mark Howard writes:
> Matthias,
>
> When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
> explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
> the bug.
well, I renamed the report.
> >From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
> changes. This had the comment:
> > the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> > dependency.
>
> Could you please explain that further.
>
> The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
>
> Why?
> This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
> your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
>
> I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
> more sense.
/usr/lib/. and /usr/lib are both valid path names, even if you append
to it. I'll change that with the next upload, but IMO there is no
requirement that path names in these files have to be normalized.
Matthias
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6 | #18 |
tag 253059 + fixed
tag 257696 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
Source: java-gnome
Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Description:
libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
Closes: 253059 257696
Changes:
java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
Files:
ea463a5d975e96
752ec9f58a7f45
90406d6aef0c0e
7dcbe55b63926c
d7b106b3e99362
f4014af4d9f85c
00f44bc0946524
5a2e4fe82faa7f
d0fa544b9c4770
3437c10d6029e2
bffc4bf6be5931
48355715894d5f
a1cf9735a9745f
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA6meYRIB
o42MOkEXZG5nGyI
=IZpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : | #19 |
That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive scripts.
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:17:08AM -0400, Mark Howard wrote:
> tag 253059 + fixed
> tag 257696 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
> Source: java-gnome
> Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 2.6.0.1-6
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
> Description:
> libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
> libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
> libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
> libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
> Closes: 253059 257696
> Changes:
> java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
> at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
> Files:
> ea463a5d975e967
> 752ec9f58a7f459
> 90406d6aef0c0e1
> 7dcbe55b63926c5
> d7b106b3e993628
> f4014af4d9f85cf
> 00f44bc09465240
> 5a2e4fe82faa7f9
> d0fa544b9c47702
> 3437c10d6029e23
> bffc4bf6be59312
> 48355715894d5fa
> a1cf9735a9745f9
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA6meYRIB
> o42MOkEXZG5nGyI
> =IZpm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://
`- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #20 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 05:17:08 -0400
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Mark Howard <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6
tag 253059 + fixed
tag 257696 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
Source: java-gnome
Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Description:
libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
Closes: 253059 257696
Changes:
java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
Files:
ea463a5d975e96
752ec9f58a7f45
90406d6aef0c0e
7dcbe55b63926c
d7b106b3e99362
f4014af4d9f85c
00f44bc0946524
5a2e4fe82faa7f
d0fa544b9c4770
3437c10d6029e2
bffc4bf6be5931
48355715894d5f
a1cf9735a9745f
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA6meYRIB
o42MOkEXZG5nGyI
=IZpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #21 |
Message-Id: <E1BhmCr-
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:25:37 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6
That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive scripts.
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:17:08AM -0400, Mark Howard wrote:
> tag 253059 + fixed
> tag 257696 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
> Source: java-gnome
> Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 2.6.0.1-6
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
> Description:
> libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
> libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
> libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
> libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
> Closes: 253059 257696
> Changes:
> java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
> at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
> Files:
> ea463a5d975e967
> 752ec9f58a7f459
> 90406d6aef0c0e1
> 7dcbe55b63926c5
> d7b106b3e993628
> f4014af4d9f85cf
> 00f44bc09465240
> 5a2e4fe82faa7f9
> d0fa544b9c47702
> 3437c10d6029e23
> bffc4bf6be59312
> 48355715894d5fa
> a1cf9735a9745f9
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA6meYRIB
> o42MOkEXZG5nGyI
> =IZpm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
.''`. Mark...
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote : | #22 |
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.
The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:
> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:
dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'
... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #23 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:41:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.
The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:
> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:
dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'
... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto (fabbione) wrote : | #24 |
The bug was mistakenly assigned to gcc-3.3 and it does not interest us. Anyway
it is fixed in sid.
In Debian Bug tracker #253059, Drew Scott Daniels (umdanie8) wrote : libgtk2-java builddep on kaffe wishlist bug | #25 |
Hi,
It may be worth keeping this bug open as a wishlist item to include a
build depends on kaffe.
Bug #256978 has a followup indicating that "kaffe" (it's builddeps) will
likely be fixed.
Drew Daniels
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #26 |
Message-ID: <20040706203815
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:38:15 -0500
From: Drew Scott Daniels <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libgtk2-java builddep on kaffe wishlist bug
Hi,
It may be worth keeping this bug open as a wishlist item to include a
build depends on kaffe.
Bug #256978 has a followup indicating that "kaffe" (it's builddeps) will
likely be fixed.
Drew Daniels
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #27 |
libffi2-dev is in warty, and it does contain the incorrect path
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #28 |
sync requested
LaMont Jones (lamont) wrote : | #29 |
gcc sync completed, some binNMU's pending
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #30 |
Are there still binNMUs pending?
LaMont Jones (lamont) wrote : | #31 |
kaffe was pending, done.
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote : | #32 |
Marked as fixed in Debian in Jul 2004
Changed in gcc-3.3: | |
status: | Unconfirmed → Fix Released |
Changed in gcc-3.3: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
retitle 253059 jar fails: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file
reassign 253059 kaffe
thanks
The problems you have are caused by automatic builds of java-gnome's
-jni packages failing on your architecture.
This is being caused (AFAIKT) by a failure in kaffe, so I'm reassigning
the report for now.
(cd build-java; \ gtk2.4- 2.4.0.jar \ kaffe/pthreads/ jre/bin/ kaffe-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/jar cf ../../lib/
`find -name "*.class"` )
/usr/lib/
make[3]: *** [../lib/gtk2.4.jar] Error 127
Full build log: buildd. debian. org/fetch. php?&pkg= java-gnome& ver=2.6. 0.1-4&arch= powerpc& stamp=108849896 7&file= log&as= raw
http://
-- www.tildemh. com
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://
`- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>