libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

Bug #6908 reported by Debian Bug Importer
12
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gcc-3.3 (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
gcc-3.3 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
LaMont Jones

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #253059 http://bugs.debian.org/253059

Revision history for this message
In , Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : Bug #253059: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available

retitle 253059 jar fails: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file
reassign 253059 kaffe
thanks

The problems you have are caused by automatic builds of java-gnome's
-jni packages failing on your architecture.

This is being caused (AFAIKT) by a failure in kaffe, so I'm reassigning
the report for now.

(cd build-java; \
/usr/bin/jar cf ../../lib/gtk2.4-2.4.0.jar \
 `find -name "*.class"` )
/usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre/bin/kaffe-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [../lib/gtk2.4.jar] Error 127

Full build log:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.6.0.1-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1088498967&file=log&as=raw

--
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
   `- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
In , Arnaud Vandyck (avdyk) wrote :

reassign 253059 gcc-3.3
retitle 253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 256978 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
thanks

arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-dev=1:3.3.4-1
...
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib'
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-dev=1:3.3.4-2
..
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib/.'

Because of this, my package can not link to the correct libs. Thanks to
fix it ;-)

Cheers,

--
Arnaud Vandyck

Revision history for this message
In , Arnaud Vandyck (avdyk) wrote :

reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
merge 256978 253059
thanks

--
Arnaud Vandyck

< jaybonci> actually d-i stands for "divine intervention" ;)
  -- in #debian-devel

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #253059 http://bugs.debian.org/253059

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 00:24:25 +0200
From: Vincent Lefevre <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available

Package: libgtk2-java
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

apt-get dist-upgrade wants to remove packages depending on libgtk2-java,
but libgtk2-java can't be installed:

"apt-get install -t unstable libgtk2-java" gives:

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgtk2-java: Depends: libgtk2-jni (= 2.6.0.1-3) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

and "apt-get install -t unstable libgtk2-jni" gives:

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package libgtk2-jni is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package libgtk2-jni has no installation candidate

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-powerpc
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <E1BfLBj-00038F-WF@localhost>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:10:27 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug #253059: libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available

retitle 253059 jar fails: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file
reassign 253059 kaffe
thanks

The problems you have are caused by automatic builds of java-gnome's
-jni packages failing on your architecture.

This is being caused (AFAIKT) by a failure in kaffe, so I'm reassigning
the report for now.

(cd build-java; \
/usr/bin/jar cf ../../lib/gtk2.4-2.4.0.jar \
 `find -name "*.class"` )
/usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre/bin/kaffe-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [../lib/gtk2.4.jar] Error 127

Full build log:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=java-gnome&ver=2.6.0.1-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1088498967&file=log&as=raw

--
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
   `- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:27:29 +0200
From: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
cc: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
Subject: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

--=-=-=

reassign 253059 gcc-3.3
retitle 253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 256978 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
thanks

arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-dev=1:3.3.4-1
...
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib'
arnaud@oz:~$ sudo apt-get install -f libffi2-dev=1:3.3.4-2
..
arnaud@oz:~$ cat /usr/lib/libffi.la | grep usr/lib
libdir='/usr/lib/.'

Because of this, my package can not link to the correct libs. Thanks to
fix it ;-)

Cheers,

--
Arnaud Vandyck

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA4s3T4vzFZu62tMIRAkVeAKCMquxo7j5/PePNcfF9r3E+oiLJuACeKH4J
BNGNq51r0Qge8g9iCbtY8mc=
=QhAf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:41:04 +0200
From: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

--=-=-=

reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
merge 256978 253059
thanks

--
Arnaud Vandyck

< jaybonci> actually d-i stands for "divine intervention" ;)
  -- in #debian-devel

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA4tED4vzFZu62tMIRAtTRAKCe1FblsppMTryE0+BJy4obDpJyFQCfdnSp
ZKtPVSfb6+N9gA91nL1E0kA=
=Z0eo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

*** Bug 6909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
unmerge 253059
reassign 253059 libgtk2-java
reassign 256978 kaffe-pthreads
thanks

the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
dependency.

Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for <email address hidden>:
>
> > reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug reassigned from package `kaffe-pthreads' to `gcc-3.3'.
>
> > merge 256978 253059
> Bug#253059: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Merged 253059 256978.
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to <email address hidden>
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
In , Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Processed: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libffi2-dev
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 253059 libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
retitle 256978 Lost dependencies on libgmp3 and libffi2
thanks

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:22:49 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Arnaud Vandyck <email address hidden>,
 Debian GCC maintainers <email address hidden>(gcc-3.3 #253059 #256978),
 <email address hidden> (Ean R. Schuessler) (kaffe-pthreads #256978)
Subject: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
unmerge 253059
reassign 253059 libgtk2-java
reassign 256978 kaffe-pthreads
thanks

the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
dependency.

Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for <email address hidden>:
>
> > reassign 256978 gcc-3.3
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug reassigned from package `kaffe-pthreads' to `gcc-3.3'.
>
> > merge 256978 253059
> Bug#253059: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Bug#256978: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la
> Merged 253059 256978.
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to <email address hidden>
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:38:48 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

clone 253059 -1
unmerge -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libffi2-dev
retitle -1 libffi2-dev: non canonical path in /usr/lib/libffi.la
retitle 253059 libgtk2-java depends on libgtk2-jni, which is not available
retitle 256978 Lost dependencies on libgmp3 and libffi2
thanks

Revision history for this message
In , Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

Matthias,

When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
the bug.

From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
changes. This had the comment:
> the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> dependency.

Could you please explain that further.

The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'

Why?
This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
your package may be in error rather than the other packages.

I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
more sense.

--
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
   `- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <E1BgIUb-0001Qd-C1@localhost>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:29:15 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

Matthias,

When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
the bug.

From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
changes. This had the comment:
> the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> dependency.

Could you please explain that further.

The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'

Why?
This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
your package may be in error rather than the other packages.

I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
more sense.

--
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
   `- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
In , Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote :

Mark Howard writes:
> Matthias,
>
> When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
> explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
> the bug.

well, I renamed the report.

> >From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
> changes. This had the comment:
> > the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> > dependency.
>
> Could you please explain that further.
>
> The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
>
> Why?
> This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
> your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
>
> I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
> more sense.

/usr/lib/. and /usr/lib are both valid path names, even if you append
to it. I'll change that with the next upload, but IMO there is no
requirement that path names in these files have to be normalized.

 Matthias

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 07:03:14 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: #253059 libffi2-dev: wrong libdir in /usr/lib/libffi.la

Mark Howard writes:
> Matthias,
>
> When you reassign, merge, change severity of bug reports, please send an
> explanatory message. In most cases, this means CC'ing your message to
> the bug.

well, I renamed the report.

> >From the BTS, I managed to find your original message which made the
> changes. This had the comment:
> > the path is correct. any idea, why these two packages don't get the
> > dependency.
>
> Could you please explain that further.
>
> The package changed from having libdir='/usr/lib' to having libdir='/usr/lib/.'
>
> Why?
> This change has clearly broken other packages, so please consider that
> your package may be in error rather than the other packages.
>
> I am no expert in these matters, but libdir='/usr/lib/' seems to make
> more sense.

/usr/lib/. and /usr/lib are both valid path names, even if you append
to it. I'll change that with the next upload, but IMO there is no
requirement that path names in these files have to be normalized.

 Matthias

Revision history for this message
In , Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote : Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6

tag 253059 + fixed
tag 257696 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
Source: java-gnome
Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Description:
 libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
 libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
 libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
 libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
 libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
 libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
Closes: 253059 257696
Changes:
 java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
     at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
Files:
 ea463a5d975e96749ad313615f8f68cd 928 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.dsc
 752ec9f58a7f4596f285a3afe05a2a1d 18712 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.diff.gz
 90406d6aef0c0e1f552881945840b08f 102148 libs optional libgnome2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 7dcbe55b63926c5d368265d6d464737d 491886 libs optional libgtk2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 d7b106b3e9936285ce0306a8582aee43 195852 doc optional libjava-gnome-doc_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 f4014af4d9f85cfb399a72311ba31f0f 13366 libs optional libgnome0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 00f44bc0946524056f7747d528fe4a7e 13364 libs optional libgtk0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 5a2e4fe82faa7f9d047d74523656b8a1 13366 libs optional libglade0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 d0fa544b9c477023696938120cee2931 13364 libs optional libgnome0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 3437c10d6029e2348950964373832c7b 13364 libs optional libgtk0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 bffc4bf6be5931256b170d6add3df3d9 63012 libs optional libglade2-java_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
 48355715894d5fac74e619300c555b56 264966 libs optional libgnome2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
 a1cf9735a9745f96e3851083e0301017 1095464 libs optional libgtk2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA6meYRIB09ZZvujwRAoKMAJ9k0k1mYGEV27NYfRiRUXNkqbdCXQCdF8QZ
o42MOkEXZG5nGyIHgkaTmEw=
=IZpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Mark Howard (mh-tildemh) wrote :

That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive scripts.

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:17:08AM -0400, Mark Howard wrote:
> tag 253059 + fixed
> tag 257696 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
> Source: java-gnome
> Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 2.6.0.1-6
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
> Description:
> libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
> libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
> libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
> libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
> Closes: 253059 257696
> Changes:
> java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
> at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
> Files:
> ea463a5d975e96749ad313615f8f68cd 928 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.dsc
> 752ec9f58a7f4596f285a3afe05a2a1d 18712 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.diff.gz
> 90406d6aef0c0e1f552881945840b08f 102148 libs optional libgnome2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 7dcbe55b63926c5d368265d6d464737d 491886 libs optional libgtk2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> d7b106b3e9936285ce0306a8582aee43 195852 doc optional libjava-gnome-doc_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> f4014af4d9f85cfb399a72311ba31f0f 13366 libs optional libgnome0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 00f44bc0946524056f7747d528fe4a7e 13364 libs optional libgtk0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 5a2e4fe82faa7f9d047d74523656b8a1 13366 libs optional libglade0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> d0fa544b9c477023696938120cee2931 13364 libs optional libgnome0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 3437c10d6029e2348950964373832c7b 13364 libs optional libgtk0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> bffc4bf6be5931256b170d6add3df3d9 63012 libs optional libglade2-java_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
> 48355715894d5fac74e619300c555b56 264966 libs optional libgnome2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
> a1cf9735a9745f96e3851083e0301017 1095464 libs optional libgtk2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA6meYRIB09ZZvujwRAoKMAJ9k0k1mYGEV27NYfRiRUXNkqbdCXQCdF8QZ
> o42MOkEXZG5nGyIHgkaTmEw=
> =IZpm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

--
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
   `- <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 05:17:08 -0400
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Mark Howard <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6

tag 253059 + fixed
tag 257696 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
Source: java-gnome
Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Description:
 libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
 libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
 libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
 libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
 libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
 libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
 libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
Closes: 253059 257696
Changes:
 java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
     at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
Files:
 ea463a5d975e96749ad313615f8f68cd 928 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.dsc
 752ec9f58a7f4596f285a3afe05a2a1d 18712 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.diff.gz
 90406d6aef0c0e1f552881945840b08f 102148 libs optional libgnome2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 7dcbe55b63926c5d368265d6d464737d 491886 libs optional libgtk2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 d7b106b3e9936285ce0306a8582aee43 195852 doc optional libjava-gnome-doc_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 f4014af4d9f85cfb399a72311ba31f0f 13366 libs optional libgnome0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 00f44bc0946524056f7747d528fe4a7e 13364 libs optional libgtk0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 5a2e4fe82faa7f9d047d74523656b8a1 13366 libs optional libglade0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 d0fa544b9c477023696938120cee2931 13364 libs optional libgnome0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 3437c10d6029e2348950964373832c7b 13364 libs optional libgtk0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
 bffc4bf6be5931256b170d6add3df3d9 63012 libs optional libglade2-java_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
 48355715894d5fac74e619300c555b56 264966 libs optional libgnome2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
 a1cf9735a9745f96e3851083e0301017 1095464 libs optional libgtk2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA6meYRIB09ZZvujwRAoKMAJ9k0k1mYGEV27NYfRiRUXNkqbdCXQCdF8QZ
o42MOkEXZG5nGyIHgkaTmEw=
=IZpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :
Download full text (3.2 KiB)

Message-Id: <E1BhmCr-0002yI-67@tildemh>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:25:37 +0100
From: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6

That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive scripts.

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:17:08AM -0400, Mark Howard wrote:
> tag 253059 + fixed
> tag 257696 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:10:42 +0100
> Source: java-gnome
> Binary: libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-jni libgtk2-jni libglade2-java libglade0-java libgnome2-java libgtk2-java libgnome0-jni libgnome2-jni libgtk0-java libgnome0-java
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 2.6.0.1-6
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
> Description:
> libglade0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libglade2-java - Java support for libglade gnome interface
> libgnome0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgnome2-java - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgnome2-jni - Java framework for creating GNOME applications
> libgtk0-java - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk0-jni - Dummy package to aid upgrade
> libgtk2-java - Gtk framework for Java
> libgtk2-jni - GTK framework for Java
> libjava-gnome-doc - API docs and example apps for GTK/GNOME java bindings
> Closes: 253059 257696
> Changes:
> java-gnome (2.6.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Build-Conflict with kaffe since the jar program it provides isn't working
> at the moment. Closes: #257696, #253059
> Files:
> ea463a5d975e96749ad313615f8f68cd 928 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.dsc
> 752ec9f58a7f4596f285a3afe05a2a1d 18712 libs optional java-gnome_2.6.0.1-6.diff.gz
> 90406d6aef0c0e1f552881945840b08f 102148 libs optional libgnome2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 7dcbe55b63926c5d368265d6d464737d 491886 libs optional libgtk2-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> d7b106b3e9936285ce0306a8582aee43 195852 doc optional libjava-gnome-doc_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> f4014af4d9f85cfb399a72311ba31f0f 13366 libs optional libgnome0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 00f44bc0946524056f7747d528fe4a7e 13364 libs optional libgtk0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 5a2e4fe82faa7f9d047d74523656b8a1 13366 libs optional libglade0-java_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> d0fa544b9c477023696938120cee2931 13364 libs optional libgnome0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> 3437c10d6029e2348950964373832c7b 13364 libs optional libgtk0-jni_2.6.0.1-6_all.deb
> bffc4bf6be5931256b170d6add3df3d9 63012 libs optional libglade2-java_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
> 48355715894d5fac74e619300c555b56 264966 libs optional libgnome2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
> a1cf9735a9745f96e3851083e0301017 1095464 libs optional libgtk2-jni_2.6.0.1-6_i386.deb
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA6meYRIB09ZZvujwRAoKMAJ9k0k1mYGEV27NYfRiRUXNkqbdCXQCdF8QZ
> o42MOkEXZG5nGyIHgkaTmEw=
> =IZpm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

--
  .''`. Mark...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
In , Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.

The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:

> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>

These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:

  dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'

... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.

Cheers,

--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:41:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.

The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:

> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>

These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:

  dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'

... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.

Cheers,

--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]

Revision history for this message
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto (fabbione) wrote :

The bug was mistakenly assigned to gcc-3.3 and it does not interest us. Anyway
it is fixed in sid.

Revision history for this message
In , Drew Scott Daniels (umdanie8) wrote : libgtk2-java builddep on kaffe wishlist bug

Hi,
It may be worth keeping this bug open as a wishlist item to include a
build depends on kaffe.

Bug #256978 has a followup indicating that "kaffe" (it's builddeps) will
likely be fixed.

     Drew Daniels

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <20040706203815.GA10544@Zimmer>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:38:15 -0500
From: Drew Scott Daniels <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libgtk2-java builddep on kaffe wishlist bug

Hi,
It may be worth keeping this bug open as a wishlist item to include a
build depends on kaffe.

Bug #256978 has a followup indicating that "kaffe" (it's builddeps) will
likely be fixed.

     Drew Daniels

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

libffi2-dev is in warty, and it does contain the incorrect path

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

sync requested

Revision history for this message
LaMont Jones (lamont) wrote :

gcc sync completed, some binNMU's pending

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Are there still binNMUs pending?

Revision history for this message
LaMont Jones (lamont) wrote :

kaffe was pending, done.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote :

Marked as fixed in Debian in Jul 2004

Changed in gcc-3.3:
status: Unconfirmed → Fix Released
Changed in gcc-3.3:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.