Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:41:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.
The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:
> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:
dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'
... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:41:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <email address hidden>
To: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of java-gnome 2.6.0.1-6
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> That wasn't an NMU. Somebody must have been messing with the archive
> scripts.
The archive scripts are doing the same thing they always have. Look very
closely at this:
> > Maintainer: <email address hidden>
> > Changed-By: Mark Howard <email address hidden>
These fields are compared purely textually, without attempting to
compare only the e-mail address portions. If you're using
'dpkg-buildpackage -m', then do:
dpkg-buildpackage -m'Mark Howard <email address hidden>'
... and consider using -k instead; otherwise fix debian/control.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]