I think this is correct:
1) @Nicolai: can you please update the FOTS_EXPECTED_FAILURES and add the W3C bug number for the last param?
replace for instance:
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 0)
with
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 21568)
2) these tests will be marked as 'diputed' once lp:1151965 is fixed.
I think this is correct: FAILURES and add the W3C bug number for the last param? FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function- decl-reserved- function- names-001 0) FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function- decl-reserved- function- names-001 21568)
1) @Nicolai: can you please update the FOTS_EXPECTED_
replace for instance:
EXPECTED_
with
EXPECTED_
2) these tests will be marked as 'diputed' once lp:1151965 is fixed.