Zorba

function declaration failures (at least 16)

Bug #1147547 reported by Sorin Marian Nasoi on 2013-03-05

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	Zorba	New	Critical	Nicolae Brinza

Bug Description

There are at least 16 failures in "prod-FunctionDecl" test set:

"function-decl-reserved-function-names-001,function-decl-reserved-function-names-003,function-decl-reserved-function-names-005,function-decl-reserved-function-names-007,function-decl-reserved-function-names-009,function-decl-reserved-function-names-012,function-decl-reserved-function-names-013,function-decl-reserved-function-names-015,function-decl-reserved-function-names-018,function-decl-reserved-function-names-019,function-decl-reserved-function-names-021,function-decl-reserved-function-names-023,function-decl-reserved-function-names-025,function-decl-reserved-function-names-027,function-decl-reserved-function-names-029,function-decl-reserved-function-names-031"

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) wrote on 2013-03-05:

Log for the 16 failures Edit (1.7 KiB, application/x-tar)

Revision history for this message

Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) wrote on 2013-03-05:

Assigned to Matthias for triage purposes: Matthias who is the best person that should try to fix these issues?

Chris Hillery (ceejatec) on 2013-03-13

Changed in zorba:
assignee:	Matthias Brantner (matthias-brantner) → Nicolae Brinza (nbrinza)

Dana Florescu (dflorescu) on 2013-03-28

Changed in zorba:
milestone:	none → 2.9

Dana Florescu (dflorescu) on 2013-03-28

Changed in zorba:
importance:	Undecided → Critical

Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) on 2013-03-28

summary:

- FOTS: Function declaration failures (at least 16)
+ function declaration failures (at least 16)

Revision history for this message

Nicolae Brinza (nbrinza) wrote on 2013-04-03:

I think these tests have incorrect expected results. They use reserved names for functions. I've opened a W3C bug for them here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21568

Revision history for this message

Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) wrote on 2013-04-03:

I think this is correct:
1) @Nicolai: can you please update the FOTS_EXPECTED_FAILURES and add the W3C bug number for the last param?
replace for instance:
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 0)
with
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 21568)

2) these tests will be marked as 'diputed' once lp:1151965 is fixed.

Dana Florescu (dflorescu) on 2013-04-05

tags:

added: parser

Revision history for this message

Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) wrote on 2013-04-18:

Nicolai I see that Mike Kay answered to the bug you reported: please see https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21568#c1

If you still think Zorba is correct, then we should mark the bugs as DISPUTED.
Here is an example for 'function-decl-reserved-function-names-001':

change
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 0)
to
EXPECTED_FOTS_FAILURE (DISPUTED prod-FunctionDecl function-decl-reserved-function-names-001 21568)
in test/CMakeLists.txt