I do not like the suggestion because the defender has a disadvantage then: the attacker can plan out his attack meticulously and commit many windows quickly. The defender then gets a lot of attack messages and has to act on them all in time (burning down buildings for example).
I think it is more symmetric the way it is now - both can only issue one command at a time.
I do not like the suggestion because the defender has a disadvantage then: the attacker can plan out his attack meticulously and commit many windows quickly. The defender then gets a lot of attack messages and has to act on them all in time (burning down buildings for example).
I think it is more symmetric the way it is now - both can only issue one command at a time.