> Version-wise, this is known:
>
> ok with XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17)
> not ok with XEmacs 21.5 (beta29)
>
> The former appears to be a decade old, so I don't know how helpful that
> is.
Yes, 21.4 is too old to tell us anything specific. If you can run through
some of the 21.5 beta versions, at least the first release (1?) and the
latest release (31?) then we will know whether the problem is with XEmacs.
Julian, do you get the problem on your version of XEmacs?
Mwelinder writes:
> Version-wise, this is known:
>
> ok with XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17)
> not ok with XEmacs 21.5 (beta29)
>
> The former appears to be a decade old, so I don't know how helpful that
> is.
Yes, 21.4 is too old to tell us anything specific. If you can run through
some of the 21.5 beta versions, at least the first release (1?) and the
latest release (31?) then we will know whether the problem is with XEmacs.
Julian, do you get the problem on your version of XEmacs?
Cheers,
Uday