Em 29-08-2011 18:29, Dirk Mcbratney escreveu:
> Doing nothing when it's already been done is, yes, rather self-
> consistent.
Do nothing is simply bad. I expect that some action initiates a reaction
(if not, this should be clear; example: disabled buttons).
>>> 1. Focus window
>>> 2. Spread, if more than one window
>>> 3. Minimize all windows
> There wouldn't be a 3. Clicking it again with multiple windows would
> spread again. (Else, how could you move back to a previous window in the
> same group?)
After 3, we return to 1. If I want to return to another window, I'll
need an extra click.
Again, I'm not talking about changing the default (so this new option
would not affect 90% of users, I guess). I'm talking about adding this
possibility to those who want this.
Em 29-08-2011 18:29, Dirk Mcbratney escreveu:
> Doing nothing when it's already been done is, yes, rather self-
> consistent.
Do nothing is simply bad. I expect that some action initiates a reaction
(if not, this should be clear; example: disabled buttons).
>>> 1. Focus window
>>> 2. Spread, if more than one window
>>> 3. Minimize all windows
> There wouldn't be a 3. Clicking it again with multiple windows would
> spread again. (Else, how could you move back to a previous window in the
> same group?)
After 3, we return to 1. If I want to return to another window, I'll
need an extra click.
Again, I'm not talking about changing the default (so this new option
would not affect 90% of users, I guess). I'm talking about adding this
possibility to those who want this.
I've done a patch to add this option (configurable via ccsm), but it was www.youtube. com/watch? v=CNVi9cRwhyU
rejected. See the result in this video:
http://