On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:32 +0000, Milan wrote:
> Should be high! Just look at the subscribers list! ;-)
> IMHO, it should be in the milestone bugs for rc. This bug is avoiding for 50% of the computers one of the important new features of Gutsy.
>
I personally believe there should be a new scheme to categorize bugs.
This one should be categorized as "embarrassing".
I am not joking, I really believe categories like that would be very
healthy. It would be more easy to identify these kind of bugs if one or
a group of developers where dedicated to get Ubuntu more polished. And I
believe there should be a group of Cannonical devs payed for polishing
the OS.
The easiest way to achieve this would possibly be a community driven
tagging system.
I will file this as a whishlist item in bugs.launchpad.net.
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:32 +0000, Milan wrote:
> Should be high! Just look at the subscribers list! ;-)
> IMHO, it should be in the milestone bugs for rc. This bug is avoiding for 50% of the computers one of the important new features of Gutsy.
>
I personally believe there should be a new scheme to categorize bugs.
This one should be categorized as "embarrassing".
I am not joking, I really believe categories like that would be very
healthy. It would be more easy to identify these kind of bugs if one or
a group of developers where dedicated to get Ubuntu more polished. And I
believe there should be a group of Cannonical devs payed for polishing
the OS.
The easiest way to achieve this would possibly be a community driven
tagging system.
I will file this as a whishlist item in bugs.launchpad.net.