(In reply to comment #7)
> Committed, thanks. Even though it is strange to see variants consisting mostly
> of VoidSymbols
Hi, thank you very much.
Yes, I would agree. The Baybayin script is alphasyllabry so it is always CV-CV, then other vowels are represented by use of a diacritical mark resulting to just 18 base "glyphs" only.
Initially I did not include "VoidSymbols" but I noticed that if it is left empty, the system checks the next "upper" keyboard in the list and producing the character there first.
1: Latin = Key1234 produces "A"
2: Baybayin = Key1234 is empty
If pressing Key1234 in Baybayin will produce the letter "A" from the Latin layout. I opted instead to hardcode "VoidSymbols" to avoid it. From what I understand, it was intentional?
Anyway, I guess that's for another thread / ticket. Thank you again!
(In reply to comment #7)
> Committed, thanks. Even though it is strange to see variants consisting mostly
> of VoidSymbols
Hi, thank you very much.
Yes, I would agree. The Baybayin script is alphasyllabry so it is always CV-CV, then other vowels are represented by use of a diacritical mark resulting to just 18 base "glyphs" only.
Initially I did not include "VoidSymbols" but I noticed that if it is left empty, the system checks the next "upper" keyboard in the list and producing the character there first.
1: Latin = Key1234 produces "A"
2: Baybayin = Key1234 is empty
If pressing Key1234 in Baybayin will produce the letter "A" from the Latin layout. I opted instead to hardcode "VoidSymbols" to avoid it. From what I understand, it was intentional?
Anyway, I guess that's for another thread / ticket. Thank you again!