It looks like both files do not have a recent time stamp, although I did a
aptitude update this morning.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:14, Ernst Blaauw <email address hidden> wrote:
> At the moment, I do not have this error, but up until now, it periodically
> returns. As soon as I encounter this bug again, I will post the output here.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:58, Michael Vogt <email address hidden>wrote:
>
>> @Ernst: if you suffer from the bug, could you please give me the output of
>> $ ls -l /var/lib/apt/periodic
>>
>> --
>> update-manager/-notifier: falsely claims that update information is
>> outdated
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436749
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>
I again have the message:
$ ls -l /var/lib/ apt/periodic success- stamp
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-11-11 07:41 update-stamp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-10-31 10:31 update-
It looks like both files do not have a recent time stamp, although I did a
aptitude update this morning.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:14, Ernst Blaauw <email address hidden> wrote:
> At the moment, I do not have this error, but up until now, it periodically apt/periodic manager/ -notifier: falsely claims that update information is /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 436749
> returns. As soon as I encounter this bug again, I will post the output here.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:58, Michael Vogt <email address hidden>wrote:
>
>> @Ernst: if you suffer from the bug, could you please give me the output of
>> $ ls -l /var/lib/
>>
>> --
>> update-
>> outdated
>> https:/
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>