Never loads click preview again if first tried offline
Bug #1478026 reported by
Sebastien Bacher
This bug affects 4 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unity-scope-click (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Critical
|
dobey | ||
Bug Description
Using a bq 4.5 on rc-proposed r76
- boot with flight mode enabled
- hold a tap on an icon to see its click preview
-> you get an empty screen bouncing forever
- go back to the apps view
- turn off flight mode/enable some data connection
- try to open a click preview view
-> you still get the empty screen and never ending bouncing
the unity8-dash.log has those errors
"Caught an error from preview(): unity::
Related branches
lp:~dobey/unity-scope-click/no-refundable-if-no-price
- PS Jenkins bot: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
- Paweł Stołowski (community): Approve
-
Diff: 107 lines (+19/-15)4 files modifiedlibclickscope/click/package.h (+2/-2)
libclickscope/click/preview.cpp (+9/-8)
libclickscope/click/preview.h (+2/-1)
libclickscope/tests/test_preview.cpp (+6/-4)
lp:~dobey/unity-scope-click/avoid-isrefundable
- PS Jenkins bot: Approve (continuous-integration)
- Charles Kerr (community): Approve
-
Diff: 107 lines (+19/-15)4 files modifiedlibclickscope/click/package.h (+2/-2)
libclickscope/click/preview.cpp (+9/-8)
libclickscope/click/preview.h (+2/-1)
libclickscope/tests/test_preview.cpp (+6/-4)
Changed in unity8 (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
assignee: | nobody → Albert Astals Cid (aacid) |
Changed in unity8 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Invalid |
no longer affects: | unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu) |
no longer affects: | unity8 (Ubuntu) |
Changed in unity-scope-click (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Critical |
assignee: | nobody → Rodney Dawes (dobey) |
Changed in unity-scope-click (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
To post a comment you must log in.
We don't do anything special connectivity wise on unity8, i've checked and we call scope.preview() again the second time so if it's not working (that i checked it does not) it must be some of the lower layers getting confused.
Pinging some people about it.