> I've tested an image built via ubuntu-bartender and using livecd-rootfs from proposed -
There was nothing in the bug test plan or description saying it would require livecd-rootfs from proposed. I checked what version that would be, and at least today it's also in updates:
Publication date of livecd-rootfs to noble-updates according to LP is today, just 5h ago, and your comment is from August 2nd, so what you used is in updates already, making this point moot. But you see the implications of not making it clear what version was used? :)
> I've tested an image built via ubuntu-bartender and using livecd-rootfs from proposed -
There was nothing in the bug test plan or description saying it would require livecd-rootfs from proposed. I checked what version that would be, and at least today it's also in updates:
livecd-rootfs | 24.04.69 | noble | source
livecd-rootfs | 24.04.74 | noble-proposed | source
livecd-rootfs | 24.04.74 | noble-updates | source
Publication date of livecd-rootfs to noble-updates according to LP is today, just 5h ago, and your comment is from August 2nd, so what you used is in updates already, making this point moot. But you see the implications of not making it clear what version was used? :)