Comment 20 for bug 308397

Revision history for this message
In , Dtownsend (dtownsend) wrote :

(In reply to comment #17)
> I just went back and looked at the regex. It would properly handle an escaped
> bogus value as well without a problem, but I'd still very much like to get
> mindset that any time a change happens with the structure of one of these URLs,
> a bug gets opened with metrics to review it for potential impact. I've opened
> Bug 469806 to that effect.

I'm not entirely sure what the benefit is in opening a bug to evaluate the potential impact of another bug. Surely it would be better for all the discussion to go in the single bug?