Al 27/09/12 03:41, En/na Colin Watson ha escrit:
> Really? The embedded terminal just tails log files, as far as I can
> see, and probably doesn't work anyway at the moment given overlayfs.
> I'm fine with the text in the embedded terminal not being localised,
> since the main purpose of the log files is to be useful for bug reports.
> The screenshots I looked at in duplicate bugs are in
> install_progress_text, not in the embedded terminal hidden by the
> expander triangle.
>
As far as I can understand it, the original bug was about untranslated
strings in the UI, not those within the embedded terminal. I too don't
think it's too important to localize the terminal output in this case,
and that the focus should rather be to get the UI fully translatable.
I think the confusion might have come from the change of title in
comment #23. I'll change it back to the original.
Al 27/09/12 03:41, En/na Colin Watson ha escrit: progress_ text, not in the embedded terminal hidden by the
> Really? The embedded terminal just tails log files, as far as I can
> see, and probably doesn't work anyway at the moment given overlayfs.
> I'm fine with the text in the embedded terminal not being localised,
> since the main purpose of the log files is to be useful for bug reports.
> The screenshots I looked at in duplicate bugs are in
> install_
> expander triangle.
>
As far as I can understand it, the original bug was about untranslated
strings in the UI, not those within the embedded terminal. I too don't
think it's too important to localize the terminal output in this case,
and that the focus should rather be to get the UI fully translatable.
I think the confusion might have come from the change of title in
comment #23. I'll change it back to the original.
-- la.wordpress. com ca/dplanella / www.twitter. com/dplanella
David Planella
Ubuntu Translations Coordinator
www.ubuntu.com / www.davidplanel
www.identi.