I had thought gnome-screensaver would control DPMS too though?
That, and/or is the timeout not sufficient for the default time of poking?
Perhaps it would be best to use --inhibit instead of --poke since it just
needs to be called (and killed) once.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:11, Evan Dandrea <email address hidden> wrote:
> Perhaps this isn't the screensaver at all, but DPMS shutting off the
> display? I guess it would be OK to disable that these days. Colin,
> what are your thoughts?
>
> --
> installer goes to sleep / activates screen saver
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209410
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Installer Team, which is subscribed to ubiquity in ubuntu.
>
I had thought gnome-screensaver would control DPMS too though?
That, and/or is the timeout not sufficient for the default time of poking?
Perhaps it would be best to use --inhibit instead of --poke since it just
needs to be called (and killed) once.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:11, Evan Dandrea <email address hidden> wrote:
> Perhaps this isn't the screensaver at all, but DPMS shutting off the /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 209410
> display? I guess it would be OK to disable that these days. Colin,
> what are your thoughts?
>
> --
> installer goes to sleep / activates screen saver
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Installer Team, which is subscribed to ubiquity in ubuntu.
>
--
Mario Limonciello
<email address hidden>