(In reply to comment #140)
> This solution is also the one given in bug 240313, so these bugs should
> probably be linked in some way. The discussion on that bug points out a
> number of issues with this approach as of January 2007.
This is causing me peevishness, but rather than comment extensively, I'll simply point out that the CSS at that bug's patch is arguably superior to the CSS in this bug's patch.
(In reply to comment #140)
> This solution is also the one given in bug 240313, so these bugs should
> probably be linked in some way. The discussion on that bug points out a
> number of issues with this approach as of January 2007.
This is causing me peevishness, but rather than comment extensively, I'll simply point out that the CSS at that bug's patch is arguably superior to the CSS in this bug's patch.