On 9/27/07, Vincenzo Ciancia <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> The point seems to be, lyx installs by default templates for classes
> that are not available, is this correct? If so, shouldn't the bug be
> solved by providing separate packages for groups of templates, depending
> on the appropriate texlive packages (maybe only texlive-publishers)?
>
> --
> lyx: missing TeX class "aa"
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3080
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
Yeah,
That's correct.
It seems a possible solution.
On 9/27/07, Vincenzo Ciancia <email address hidden> wrote: publishers) ? /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 3080
>
> The point seems to be, lyx installs by default templates for classes
> that are not available, is this correct? If so, shouldn't the bug be
> solved by providing separate packages for groups of templates, depending
> on the appropriate texlive packages (maybe only texlive-
>
> --
> lyx: missing TeX class "aa"
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
"In a world without fences who needs Gates"