Comment #8 From Michael Vogt:
> No, it's too late at this stage and it was not really discussed at the last
> developers submit. We should set it onto the agenda for the next submit though,
> it's a change that should be done very early in the release cycle.
Comment #8 From Michael Vogt:
> No, it's too late at this stage and it was not really discussed at the last
> developers submit. We should set it onto the agenda for the next submit though,
> it's a change that should be done very early in the release cycle.
There is no need for discuss about instaling recommended packages by default - www.debian. org/doc/ debian- policy/ ch-relationship s.html# s-binarydeps ):
all needed info about recommends field is in Debian policy:
( http://
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this
one in all but unusual installations.
aptitude follows Debian policy, so, why synaptic shouldn't follow ?