2009/5/18 Séverin Lemaignan <email address hidden>:
> What can be done to solve this bug which affect the final release of
> Jaunty as well? since it seems unlikely that a recompiled version of
> squeak-vm is to be proposed within the Jaunty cycle (but I may be
> wrong?),
I'm not sure; this would have to be dealt with by the squeak-vm maintainer(s).
Hi,
2009/5/18 Séverin Lemaignan <email address hidden>:
> What can be done to solve this bug which affect the final release of
> Jaunty as well? since it seems unlikely that a recompiled version of
> squeak-vm is to be proposed within the Jaunty cycle (but I may be
> wrong?),
I'm not sure; this would have to be dealt with by the squeak-vm maintainer(s).
> I think we could at least offer a "patched" version of the /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ etoys/+ bug/301190.
> etoys launch script, without the -xshm option, as proposed on
> https:/
Agree. As a workaround, this seems to be fine.
Best,
Michael