On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:44:41 -0400
"Maik Wagner" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am very glad that somebody is looking at maintaining this package.
> Are you looking to primarily support Ubuntu or Debian.
I'm primaraly a packager for Debian but keep in mind that is traditionally via Debian that applications and updates to those applications are done. OTOH; if I were not interested in the status of SQL-Ledger in Ubuntu, I would not have been reviewing the bugs present for it there.
> As upstream (DWS Systems) doesn't have its own github.com or other
> source code repository
There not being a public repository for upstream is definitely an issue.
> would it be possible to unpack the upstream
> tarball in launchpad.net and apply the missing files there?
That will be changing at some point, possibly, due to infrastructure changes at Debian.
There is also this packaging repository at GitHub, mirrored from the Debian one, where there is
a branch for packaging v3.2.5: https://github.com/rocasa/pkg-sql-ledger
And regarding the missing sourse files issue itself; other applications use something like that same file, so need to see how they handle it.
> If you are interested I completed some language packs for this
> application as well and I quite enjoy using SQL Ledger.
Shouldn't something like that be sent to upstream?
> Would you mind sharing how to reproduce these bugs?
You mean, those lintian errors? A minimal command line for that is as follows (where my system
is set to automatically run Lintian after the build and also includes an apropriate '-e" option): debuild -rfakeroot -us -uc
That, of course, is on an extracted sql-ledger archive with an apropriate debian/ directory.
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:44:41 -0400
"Maik Wagner" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am very glad that somebody is looking at maintaining this package.
> Are you looking to primarily support Ubuntu or Debian.
I'm primaraly a packager for Debian but keep in mind that is traditionally via Debian that applications and updates to those applications are done. OTOH; if I were not interested in the status of SQL-Ledger in Ubuntu, I would not have been reviewing the bugs present for it there.
> As upstream (DWS Systems) doesn't have its own github.com or other
> source code repository
There not being a public repository for upstream is definitely an issue.
> would it be possible to unpack the upstream
> tarball in launchpad.net and apply the missing files there?
There is the Debian packaging repository, currently at: /anonscm. debian. org/gitweb/ ?p=collab- maint/sql- ledger. git.
https:/
That will be changing at some point, possibly, due to infrastructure changes at Debian. /github. com/rocasa/ pkg-sql- ledger
There is also this packaging repository at GitHub, mirrored from the Debian one, where there is
a branch for packaging v3.2.5:
https:/
And regarding the missing sourse files issue itself; other applications use something like that same file, so need to see how they handle it.
> If you are interested I completed some language packs for this
> application as well and I quite enjoy using SQL Ledger.
Shouldn't something like that be sent to upstream?
> Would you mind sharing how to reproduce these bugs?
You mean, those lintian errors? A minimal command line for that is as follows (where my system
is set to automatically run Lintian after the build and also includes an apropriate '-e" option): debuild -rfakeroot -us -uc
That, of course, is on an extracted sql-ledger archive with an apropriate debian/ directory.