@Rolf: Can you please review, add missing information if any and set your name below the report? Thanks.
When compiling the package on my machine, I noticed the following output:
-------------------- snip ---------------------------
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfontconfig.so.1 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libatk-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgio-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcairo.so.2 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpango-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfreetype.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kasumi/usr/bin/kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
-------------------- snip ---------------------------
Anything to do about that? Or should we ignore those claims?
MIR is here: https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/MainInclusi onReport/ Kasumi
@Rolf: Can you please review, add missing information if any and set your name below the report? Thanks.
When compiling the package on my machine, I noticed the following output:
------- ------- ------ snip ------- ------- ------- ------ kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). pixbuf- 2.0.so. 0 could be avoided if "debian/ kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). 1.0.so. 0 could be avoided if "debian/ kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). 1.0.so. 0 could be avoided if "debian/ kasumi/ usr/bin/ kasumi" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). ------- ------ snip ------- ------- ------- ------
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfontconfig.so.1 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libatk-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgio-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgdk_
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcairo.so.2 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpango-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangocairo-
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfreetype.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangoft2-
-------
Anything to do about that? Or should we ignore those claims?
And the following lintian warnings:
Now running lintian... without- copyright- notice entry-invalid- category Applications /usr/share/ applications/ kasumi. desktop uses-apps- section /usr/share/ menu/kasumi: 2 creates- new-section Apps/Tools /usr/share/ menu/kasumi: 2
W: kasumi: copyright-
W: kasumi: desktop-
W: kasumi: menu-item-
W: kasumi: menu-item-
Finished running lintian.
Not sure how serious they are, please comment.