Yann Dirson wrote: > As can be seen from > http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rubyunit/news/1.html -2.1 was a NMU > for 1.8. It did not make it into a release, so maybe it is not worth > to add a conflict...
rubyunit is already removed from testing/unstable. (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=224375&archive=yes)
And stable has rubyunit_0.5.2-2. The version of rubyunit contains files only for ruby_1.6.
-- akira yamada <URL:http://arika.org>
Yann Dirson wrote: packages. qa.debian. org/r/rubyunit/ news/1. html -2.1 was a NMU
> As can be seen from
> http://
> for 1.8. It did not make it into a release, so maybe it is not worth
> to add a conflict...
rubyunit is already removed from testing/unstable. bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 224375& archive= yes)
(http://
And stable has rubyunit_0.5.2-2.
The version of rubyunit contains files only for ruby_1.6.
-- arika.org>
akira yamada <URL:http://