Comment 0 for bug 1990575
Revision history for this message
| Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) wrote | #0 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
[Availability]
The package ruby-rack is already in Ubuntu universe.
The package ruby-rack build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 (arch:all)
Link to package [[https:/
[Rationale]
The package ruby-rack is required in Ubuntu main for thin and ruby-sinatra
promotions which are runtime dependencies of pcs (the main reason for this
promotion).
Ideally, we expect that ruby-rack (and pcs) will be promoted in the Kinetic
development cycle. The idea is to promote only the ruby-rack binary.
[Security]
Required links:
https:/
3 CVEs were found, one from 2018 and two from 2020.
Searching in the OSS security mailing list archive I found:
https:/
https:/
https:/
https:/
Reports 14 CVEs, all of them medium or low. In Kinetic, some of them still need
investigation and others fixes.
No `suid` or `sgid` binaries.
No executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin`.
Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs.
Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...).
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
The package works well right after install.
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu and has not too many
and long term critical bugs open
- Ubuntu https:/
- Debian https:/
The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support.
[Quality assurance - testing]
The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails
it makes the build fail, link to build log:
https:/
The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on
this list of architectures: amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x.
Link to test logs:
https:/
The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now. Only in i386, where
some dependencies are not installable.
[Quality assurance - packaging]
debian/watch is present and works.
debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field.
Lintian overrides are not present. Here is the output of `lintian --pedantic`
against Kinetic version:
W: ruby-rack source: newer-standards
P: ruby-rack source: maintainer-
This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
The package will not be installed by default.
Packaging and build is easy, link to d/rules:
https:/
[UI standards]
Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation).
[Dependencies]
No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main.
[Standards compliance]
This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy.
[Maintenance/Owner]
Owning Team will be Server.
Team is not yet, but will subscribe to the package before promotion.
This does not use static builds.
This does not use vendored code.
This package is not rust based.
The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last
test rebuild.
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well.
Upstream Name is: rack.
Link to upstream project: https:/