On 09/08/13 18:20, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I've added a patch that links librutil.so with -lpthread, please
> consider applying it in Debian/upstream. Thanks!
>
There have been efforts to fix a bunch of issues like this upstream
(there is a LIBPTHREAD_LIBADD macro in 1.8.12 now, although it wasn't
added to rutil)
Can you let me know when Ubuntu informed upstream about the issue?
I'm keen to work out why it wasn't fixed properly in 1.8.12 or a prior
release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 09/08/13 18:20, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I've added a patch that links librutil.so with -lpthread, please
> consider applying it in Debian/upstream. Thanks!
>
There have been efforts to fix a bunch of issues like this upstream
(there is a LIBPTHREAD_LIBADD macro in 1.8.12 now, although it wasn't
added to rutil)
Can you let me know when Ubuntu informed upstream about the issue?
I'm keen to work out why it wasn't fixed properly in 1.8.12 or a prior
release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
SBR/1AAoJEOm1uw Jp1aqDTtsP/ 3+GXg6Q06chm7ct 5i5niTBx 2CKUbZ9oQLbcnKn 5FJ6dBhxVroHv/ duWsWKrVLMxzPjW HsQfP hjC8ZDj20OkiPF8 /5ljBApELDU8K9U 2Q0AIFW/ attd7ZUWLvJ OTQp9X92pnvHQv6 A0m6UJzGyvjeSq3 +fLAPVmdFxmVY4H fBT0Yfo toHQAEUgKwOpUMf uvcLnh/ YnwJrz5crd56OGP ZRh1Bq8i1vmc FEjZVqfx15e45oz 4GAC5MrlluZVX6m 3hrn4OpUHLeBXpn lrOr l5bFX6TXsEhay95 boS19VU0G3x7cR1 wdJOFnaQpdmztGn nLnj 8LgMYDBcp1Ov8lH 6OQWJaFuypnaQ/ cNzp2z/ p1k+1xQkA/ OaE 0lzBjXy4dMGysId imF8oGoqz3i3oqH sDinzolEPvndke4 AHZ0 5LKnvrGnNnBnLTA EsWd/36E+ EhQJiS6m4l3sJpp q5RZxeDWng 6EgB+JV4XSPMi6N sD6nIYjFJZCRug7 hWE7LYAZIZ+ 4gT6R2Mk tZl5xNHDvkJ
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJ
8VXEQLM80mEzQrg
pbNF04c815r5g4V
19aCKyp9VQm+
WzMh4XCfv5uXVgh
LQNReh2mzFs5uH8
rNwH7xUND22i1ao
W6oVZpmimmTJgqg
WcxFRJqdm6WjNqr
AVGCzNxRnCoRuSZ
mPuE8Yq6Cf5HS3I
XoKtTMba/
=K/cx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----