Comment 4 for bug 243141

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, aomighty <email address hidden> wrote:
> I don't quite understand what your description of the bug means. What
> exactly is the problem?
If the question is "Is this bug fixed in Jaunty?", the answer is yes.
I installed Jaunty and verified those bugs are not present.

We've just released gmpy v1.04 that fixes some uncommon bugs and
includes some performance improvements.

If I can be any assistance, please let me know.

casevh
>
> Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> Can you confirm this bug on jaunty?
>>
>> ** Changed in: python-gmpy (Ubuntu)
>>        Status: New => Incomplete
>>
>
> --
> errors on 64-bit platform
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243141
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “python-gmpy” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: python-gmpy
>
> There are two serious bugs on 64-bit platforms. The bugs impact all releases of gmpy prior to v1.03 on any 64-bit platform.
>
> 1) gmpy.mpz(2**32) returns 0
>
> 2) hash() returns a 32-bit value but it should return a 64-bit value.
>
> These bugs, and a few others, are fixed in the recent gmpy v1.03 release.
>
> I am one of the maintainers of gmpy so please let me know if there is anything I can do to get the fixes implemented.
>
> Thanks,
>
> casevh
>