[Ubuntu] [hardy] OOo FTBFS on powerpc due to timeout

[Chris Cheney]

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

It seems powerpc hates OOo. So I will have to fully disable Java and see if it builds properly.

Need:

ENABLE_JAVA=n
ENABLE_REPORTDESIGN=n

Also remove from:

OOO_JAVA_ARCHS

[Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde)]

Apart form removing powerpc from OOO_JAVA_ARCHS you may also need to change OOO_ARCHS to OOO_JAVA_ARCHS in control.reportdesign.in (or whatever that file is called).

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package openoffice.org - 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu3

---------------
openoffice.org (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu3) hardy; urgency=low

  [ Chris Cheney ]
  * Resynchronise with Debian (r1062).
    - debian/control.ubuntu-feisty.in:
      . Removed. Closes LP: #213786
    - debian/rules:
      . Properly disable java on powerpc. Closes LP: #214042, #214217
  * Resynchronise with ooo-build (r12162).
    - ooo-build/patches/src680/spellcheck-fix.diff:
      . Corrects bug with manual spellchecking. Closes LP: #213323
  * ubuntu/desktop-templates.diff:
    ubuntu/desktop-translations.diff:
    - Actually apply these patches to ooo-build. Closes LP: #214060

  [ Matthias Klose ]
  * Add openintro_ubuntu_sun.bmp and openabout_ubuntu_sun.bmp; add legalise
    to debian/copyright.

 -- Chris Cheney <email address hidden> Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:32:50 -0500

[sam tygier (samtygier)]

powerpc and ooo are still not friends :-(

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/1:2.4.0-3ubuntu3/+build/562837

should this be reopened, or a new bug filed?

[Chris Cheney (ccheney)]

If 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu4 also fails feel free to reopen this bug. It has already been uploaded. 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu3 failed for unrelated reasons to the previous failure and I believe I have fixed that problem as well.

Thanks,

Chris Cheney

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:55:33PM -0000, sam tygier wrote:
> powerpc and ooo are still not friends :-(

> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/1:2.4.0-3ubuntu3/+build/562837

> should this be reopened, or a new bug filed?

This unrelated build failure, which affected multiple architectures, should
already be fixed in the upload of 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu4 that's currently
building.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>