It is, at the very least, not STRICTLY a wpasupplicant issue: wpasupplicant
can add an interface to set the channel, but even if that were the case,
NetworkManager would still need to use that interface. Please reopen.
On 10/8/07, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> this looks like a wpasupplicant issue.
>
> ** Also affects: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> ** Changed in: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> NetworkManager does not set channel when creating ad-hoc network
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112009
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that
is struck with the difference between what things are and what they ought to
be.
- William Hazlitt
It is, at the very least, not STRICTLY a wpasupplicant issue: wpasupplicant
can add an interface to set the channel, but even if that were the case,
NetworkManager would still need to use that interface. Please reopen.
On 10/8/07, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 112009
>
> this looks like a wpasupplicant issue.
>
> ** Also affects: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> ** Changed in: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> NetworkManager does not set channel when creating ad-hoc network
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that
is struck with the difference between what things are and what they ought to
be.
- William Hazlitt
Ohad Lutzky