For reference, I've discovered a linux-netdev mailing-list article describing this and an underlying change to the way the IFF_RUNNING flag is used from March 2006.
commit b00055aacdb172c05067612278ba27265fcd05ce
Author: Stefan Rompf <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 20 17:09:11 2006 -0800
[NET] core: add RFC2863 operstate
this patch adds a dormant flag to network devices, RFC2863 operstate derived
from these flags and possibility for userspace interaction. It allows drivers
to signal that a device is unusable for user traffic without disabling
queueing (and therefore the possibility for protocol establishment traffic to
flow) and a userspace supplicant (WPA, 802.1X) to mark a device unusable
without changes to the driver.
It is the result of our long discussion. However I must admit that it
represents what Jamal and I agreed on with compromises towards Krzysztof, but
Thomas and Krzysztof still disagree with some parts. Anyway I think it should
be applied.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Rompf <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <email address hidden>
So, on the face of it looks as if no user-space application should rely on IFF_RUNNING.
For reference, I've discovered a linux-netdev mailing-list article describing this and an underlying change to the way the IFF_RUNNING flag is used from March 2006.
http:// marc.info/ ?l=linux- netdev& m=1229225346300 00&w=2
commit b00055aacdb172c 05067612278ba27 265fcd05ce
Author: Stefan Rompf <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 20 17:09:11 2006 -0800
[NET] core: add RFC2863 operstate
this patch adds a dormant flag to network devices, RFC2863 operstate derived
from these flags and possibility for userspace interaction. It allows drivers
to signal that a device is unusable for user traffic without disabling
queueing (and therefore the possibility for protocol establishment traffic to
flow) and a userspace supplicant (WPA, 802.1X) to mark a device unusable
without changes to the driver.
It is the result of our long discussion. However I must admit that it
represents what Jamal and I agreed on with compromises towards Krzysztof, but
Thomas and Krzysztof still disagree with some parts. Anyway I think it should
be applied.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Rompf <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <email address hidden>
So, on the face of it looks as if no user-space application should rely on IFF_RUNNING.