Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> From the policy manual:
>
> 2.2.2 The contrib section
>
> Every package in contrib and non-US/contrib must comply with the DFSG.
>
> In addition, the packages in contrib and non-US/contrib
>
> * must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, and
> * must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual.
>
> Furthermore, packages in contrib must not require a package in a non-US
> section for compilation or execution.
>
> Examples of packages which would be included in contrib or
> non-US/contrib are:
>
> * free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
> which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, and
> * wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
> programs.
>
>
> "wrapper" is even in the name. It's only useful function is to
> facilitate the use of a non-free program.
>
Replying to myself here. I just read some newer messages in the thread.
I retract my statement, as I was unaware of free drivers that could be
used in conjunction with ndiswrapper.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:59:25 -0500
From: Roberto Sanchez <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
------- ------- enigFA7BB24B2E4 506B5853CF508 Transfer- Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> From the policy manual:
>
> 2.2.2 The contrib section
>
> Every package in contrib and non-US/contrib must comply with the DFSG.
>
> In addition, the packages in contrib and non-US/contrib
>
> * must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, and
> * must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual.
>
> Furthermore, packages in contrib must not require a package in a non-US
> section for compilation or execution.
>
> Examples of packages which would be included in contrib or
> non-US/contrib are:
>
> * free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
> which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, and
> * wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
> programs.
>
>
> "wrapper" is even in the name. It's only useful function is to
> facilitate the use of a non-free program.
>
Replying to myself here. I just read some newer messages in the thread.
I retract my statement, as I was unaware of free drivers that could be
used in conjunction with ndiswrapper.
-Roberto Sanchez
------- ------- enigFA7BB24B2E4 506B5853CF508 pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: OpenPGP digital signature Disposition: attachment; filename= "signature. asc"
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
oonTOp2oRAhQ0AJ 9UBaJBe+ THt04mhqcIbxjxt V8/IACfX47Y MmbfOAJM=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iD8DBQFB3dDkTfh
z7U3JYM6HaGyIUn
=KjaU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------- ------- enigFA7BB24B2E4 506B5853CF508- -