Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>>Package: ndiswrapper
>>Severity: serious
>>Tags: sarge, sid
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone
>>>>into his shell and refuses to discuss this problem.
>>>
>>>Btw, could anyone explain why ndiswrapper is in main? It's only use
>>>is to run propritary windows drivers inside the linux kernel, so it's
>>>a clear fit for contrib.
>
>
> Since when does usage matter? frozen-bubble's only use is to waste
> time. My time isn't free, so remove it from main!
>
From the policy manual:
2.2.2 The contrib section
Every package in contrib and non-US/contrib must comply with the DFSG.
In addition, the packages in contrib and non-US/contrib
* must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, and
* must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual.
Furthermore, packages in contrib must not require a package in a non-US
section for compilation or execution.
Examples of packages which would be included in contrib or
non-US/contrib are:
* free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, and
* wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
programs.
"wrapper" is even in the name. It's only useful function is to
facilitate the use of a non-free program.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:56:13 -0500
From: Roberto Sanchez <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper should be in contrib
------- ------- enig677E2122CE3 B48A6A9E66C99 Transfer- Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-
Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>>Package: ndiswrapper
>>Severity: serious
>>Tags: sarge, sid
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone
>>>>into his shell and refuses to discuss this problem.
>>>
>>>Btw, could anyone explain why ndiswrapper is in main? It's only use
>>>is to run propritary windows drivers inside the linux kernel, so it's
>>>a clear fit for contrib.
>
>
> Since when does usage matter? frozen-bubble's only use is to waste
> time. My time isn't free, so remove it from main!
>
From the policy manual:
2.2.2 The contrib section
Every package in contrib and non-US/contrib must comply with the DFSG.
In addition, the packages in contrib and non-US/contrib
* must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, and
* must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual.
Furthermore, packages in contrib must not require a package in a non-US
section for compilation or execution.
Examples of packages which would be included in contrib or
non-US/contrib are:
* free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, and
* wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
programs.
"wrapper" is even in the name. It's only useful function is to
facilitate the use of a non-free program.
-Roberto Sanchez
------- ------- enig677E2122CE3 B48A6A9E66C99 pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: OpenPGP digital signature Disposition: attachment; filename= "signature. asc"
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
oonTOp2oRAlhXAJ 41AbXQT6lYVp2qE 4BeN4F4g1N9UQCe OeuW 7zwIafto=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iD8DBQFB3dAmTfh
V+MzXRlJxI2UD9l
=nEJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------- ------- enig677E2122CE3 B48A6A9E66C99- -