I think that the correct behavior would be to not rearrange the files after
their filetype is corrected. In the example video I attached, the task I was
trying to accomplish was to select a large continuous number of files in
that directory but I was unable to since each time I picked the anchor file
for a shift-click selection, it would be resorted to the top of the
directory. So for both performance and usability concerns, I think the
browser should simply sort by extension and leave it at that.
-Sam
On 5/20/07, Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your bug. The change is because the real type doesn't
> match the filename so it's correctly when you click on it and the view
> is reorganized. The files are not read to determine the type when
> opening a folder because it would be too slow. Do you have any
> suggestion on how it should react if you think the current one is buggy?
>
> ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Low
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
> Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
> --
> strange sorting behavior in nautilus
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112170
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
I think that the correct behavior would be to not rearrange the files after
their filetype is corrected. In the example video I attached, the task I was
trying to accomplish was to select a large continuous number of files in
that directory but I was unable to since each time I picked the anchor file
for a shift-click selection, it would be resorted to the top of the
directory. So for both performance and usability concerns, I think the
browser should simply sort by extension and leave it at that.
-Sam
On 5/20/07, Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 112170
>
> Thank you for your bug. The change is because the real type doesn't
> match the filename so it's correctly when you click on it and the view
> is reorganized. The files are not read to determine the type when
> opening a folder because it would be too slow. Do you have any
> suggestion on how it should react if you think the current one is buggy?
>
> ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Low
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
> Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
> --
> strange sorting behavior in nautilus
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>