Comment 14 for bug 550100

ShaunS, the Mythbuntu developers try to keep as small a diff as
absolutely possible with upstream (with a very strong preference for
no difference at all). Since your first patch is based on what is
committed to upstream trunk, it would be preferred over the
pulse-latency-001.patch since upstream hasn't indicated they are
planning on using it.

Having said that, I don't know enough about this code to know if your
buffer size change has any negative impacts, or if it impacts
non-Pulse audio applications... do you? I'd hope being named
"audiooutputpulse.cpp", it would only apply to pulse - but making
assumptions about such things can be dangerous.

BTW, Dealing with audio upstream requires patience, and that's even
ignoring the fact that this relates to pulse audio, which gets even
less love.