Comment 5 for bug 1718238

Revision history for this message
Egmont Koblinger (egmont-gmail) wrote :

(Daniel, may I please kindly recommend that next time when one of the bugs contains all the information present in the other plus much-much more then mark it as duplicate the other way around, even if chronologically incorrect? IMO that's much more useful for continuing to work on it and hopefully getting it fixed eventually. Thanks!)