I just received my first response to the patch I filed this morning at 11:44AM (EST).
The full response is as follows:
> --- ./intel_lvds.old 2011-12-20 13:25:49.368291249 -0500 > +++ ./intel_lvds.c 2011-12-20 13:26:05.160291248 -0500 > @@ -709,6 +709,14 @@ > }, > { > .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, > + .ident = "Clientron E830", > + .matches = { > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Clientron"), > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E830"), > + }, > + }, > + { > + .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, > .ident = "Asus EeeBox PC EB1007", > .matches = { > DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer INC."), Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <email address hidden>
- ajax
Unsure what reviewed consists of, but there does appear to be action on it.
I just received my first response to the patch I filed this morning at 11:44AM (EST).
The full response is as follows:
> --- ./intel_lvds.old 2011-12-20 13:25:49.368291249 -0500 lvds_dmi_ callback, DMI_SYS_ VENDOR, "Clientron"), DMI_PRODUCT_ NAME, "E830"), lvds_dmi_ callback, DMI_SYS_ VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer INC."),
> +++ ./intel_lvds.c 2011-12-20 13:26:05.160291248 -0500
> @@ -709,6 +709,14 @@
> },
> {
> .callback = intel_no_
> + .ident = "Clientron E830",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(
> + DMI_MATCH(
> + },
> + },
> + {
> + .callback = intel_no_
> .ident = "Asus EeeBox PC EB1007",
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <email address hidden>
- ajax
Unsure what reviewed consists of, but there does appear to be action on it.