Comment 2 for bug 331014
Revision history for this message
| Woodrow Douglass (woodrowdouglass) wrote | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
It seems to me the problem is with hasciicam and not UVC. UVC is a v4l2 device, and as far as i can tell, VIDIOCGMBUF is a v4l1 ioctl. Should a v4l1 compatability layer be implemented in UVC, or should the ioctl be updated in hasciicam? I'm not sure.