I think we have misalignment here, there are two set of patches
1. The patch to load the firmware from the different path (the patches are reverted by LP #1860642.
2. The patch to fix hanging issues when sof_probe_continue() is failed[2].
Intel (Mengdong@Intel) is not planning to backport [2]patches to sof-v5.0 and mainline-kernel-5.3.
But Canonical should still be able to land[1] patches to load the firmware from the different path, isn't it? We need to align how we plan to to ship the firmware, and in which version of path.
Hi, Hui
I think we have misalignment here, there are two set of patches
1. The patch to load the firmware from the different path (the patches are reverted by LP #1860642. continue( ) is failed[2].
2. The patch to fix hanging issues when sof_probe_
Intel (Mengdong@Intel) is not planning to backport [2]patches to sof-v5.0 and mainline- kernel- 5.3.
But Canonical should still be able to land[1] patches to load the firmware from the different path, isn't it? We need to align how we plan to to ship the firmware, and in which version of path.
[1] https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1860642 /github. com/thesofproje ct/linux/ pull/1746/ commits
[2] Fix sof core error handling (v3, alternative to R1743/1745) by kv2019i · Pull Request #1746 · thesofproject/linux - https:/