On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:59 PM, _oOMOo_ <email address hidden> wrote:
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, seeing that the version in backports is a)
> newer and b) appears to work better than the packaged version, why is it
> not already in Hardy?
because it's backported from linux 2.6.25 (which is an "unstable"
kernel - so the odd minor version number) and because hardy officially
ships with 2.6.24
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:59 PM, _oOMOo_ <email address hidden> wrote:
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, seeing that the version in backports is a)
> newer and b) appears to work better than the packaged version, why is it
> not already in Hardy?
because it's backported from linux 2.6.25 (which is an "unstable"
kernel - so the odd minor version number) and because hardy officially
ships with 2.6.24