> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Neil Woolford
>
> Sent: 12/31/11 11:54 AM
>
> To: Christopher M. Penalver
>
> Subject: Bug report for 908326, pair kerning in impress
> I've uploaded the document in question.
>
> Unfortunately when I try to use apport-collect 908326 the process fails
> as the bug report uses 'libreoffice' as a package name, not the correct
> 'libreoffice-impress'. Can this be altered? Or is there some way of
> overriding the package name or manually reporting the required
> information?
>
> Neil
> --
> This message was sent from Launchpad by
> Neil Woolford (https://launchpad.net/~neil-neilwoolford)
> using the "Contact this user" link on your profile page
> (https://launchpad.net/~penalvch).
> For more information see
> https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/ContactingPeople
It's fine that your apport'ing under libreoffice instead of libreoffice-impress. It gives triagers and developers required information about your LO installation, despite not being as specific as you mentioned.
Neil Woolford:
> ----- Original Message ----- impress' . Can this be altered? Or is there some way of /launchpad. net/~neil- neilwoolford) /launchpad. net/~penalvch). /help.launchpad .net/YourAccoun t/ContactingPeo ple
>
> From: Neil Woolford
>
> Sent: 12/31/11 11:54 AM
>
> To: Christopher M. Penalver
>
> Subject: Bug report for 908326, pair kerning in impress
> I've uploaded the document in question.
>
> Unfortunately when I try to use apport-collect 908326 the process fails
> as the bug report uses 'libreoffice' as a package name, not the correct
> 'libreoffice-
> overriding the package name or manually reporting the required
> information?
>
> Neil
> --
> This message was sent from Launchpad by
> Neil Woolford (https:/
> using the "Contact this user" link on your profile page
> (https:/
> For more information see
> https:/
It's fine that your apport'ing under libreoffice instead of libreoffice- impress. It gives triagers and developers required information about your LO installation, despite not being as specific as you mentioned.