Ubuntu
libfcgi package

  1. Bug #1017978
  2. Comment #19

Comment 19 for bug 1017978

Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

Sounds like it is worth a second look at radosgw then, thanks for the clarification.

MIR team, would appreciate a second review of the contents of the radosgw binary package to see if it can be promoted to main as well. Thanks!