On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:20:46AM -0000, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Using a ~landscapeX suffix makes sense to me, thanks for the hint.
>
> Please would you mind attaching the diff for debian/control? I'll
> commit it to the branch.
>
The maintainer field should be set to Ubuntu Developers [1] *only* for
packages uploaded to the Ubuntu archive. For the packages published in
the Landscape PPA it should be set to the Landscape team - so that users
of the landscape PPA don't contact the Ubuntu Developers team.
I'm not sure how many branches do you have, but I don't think that the
Maintainer field should be set to Ubuntu Developers in trunk/. If you
maintain a separate packaging branch for the ubuntu package it makes
sense to set the Maintainer field there.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:20:46AM -0000, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Using a ~landscapeX suffix makes sense to me, thanks for the hint.
>
> Please would you mind attaching the diff for debian/control? I'll
> commit it to the branch.
>
The maintainer field should be set to Ubuntu Developers [1] *only* for
packages uploaded to the Ubuntu archive. For the packages published in
the Landscape PPA it should be set to the Landscape team - so that users
of the landscape PPA don't contact the Ubuntu Developers team.
[1]: https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/DebianMaint ainerField
I'm not sure how many branches do you have, but I don't think that the
Maintainer field should be set to Ubuntu Developers in trunk/. If you
maintain a separate packaging branch for the ubuntu package it makes
sense to set the Maintainer field there.
-- www.ubuntu. com
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer http://