Tom K. C. Chiu wrote:
> can't we simply split the package into two?
>
it has been split into two already. The correct packages are now
language-pack-kde-zh-hans (Simplified Chinese) and
language-pack-kde-zh-hant (Traditional Chinese). All what's needed is
that change to be reflected in the dependencies.
Tom K. C. Chiu wrote: pack-kde- zh-hans (Simplified Chinese) and pack-kde- zh-hant (Traditional Chinese). All what's needed is
> can't we simply split the package into two?
>
it has been split into two already. The correct packages are now
language-
language-
that change to be reflected in the dependencies.