>>Yup, what you're seeing is a binary-compatibility conflict between
>>librmagick-ruby1.8_1.6.0-1 (which was built against ImageMagick-6.0.6),
>>and the newer ImageMagick-6.2.x libraries.
>
> BTW:
> Isn't this an error of the ImageMagick package?
>
> If the library is not API compatible, it should have a different
> version number and not link against.
Apologies for the delay. Hadmut, I think you're right.
Ryuichi, given that there seems to have been an ABI change here, should
the so-version of libmagick have been increased?
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:02:22 +1000
From: Mike Williams <email address hidden>
To: Hadmut Danisch <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
CC: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320029: File read error
clone 320029 -1
reassign -1 libmagick6 6:6.2.3.3-1
thanks
Hadmut Danisch wrote:
>>Yup, what you're seeing is a binary- compatibility conflict between ruby1.8_ 1.6.0-1 (which was built against ImageMagick-6.0.6),
>>librmagick-
>>and the newer ImageMagick-6.2.x libraries.
>
> BTW:
> Isn't this an error of the ImageMagick package?
>
> If the library is not API compatible, it should have a different
> version number and not link against.
Apologies for the delay. Hadmut, I think you're right.
Ryuichi, given that there seems to have been an ABI change here, should
the so-version of libmagick have been increased?
-- www.dogbiscuit. org/mdub/
cheers, MikeW http://