Comment 10 for bug 20574

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:13:19 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Daniel Kobras <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Proposed NMU for imagemagick soname change.

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:30:12PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> [Redirecting discussion from ale bug to cloned imagemagick bug.]

> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > Imagemagick upstream has released a new version with bumped soname th=
is
> > > weekend. Should this version go in as soon as possible, or would
> > > KDE/libsnmp benefit from a few days' delay?

> > I think it would be a good idea to wait until GNOME 2.10 makes it into
> > testing before uploading; I haven't confirmed that it makes a
> > difference, but the current transitions are already complicated enough
> > that I believe the caution is warranted.

> Okay. Steve, now that most of Gnome appears to have made it, do we have
> a go for the imagemagick soname change?=20

Yes, I think it should be clear now.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDLoEvKN6ufymYLloRAgs5AKCwuWUHsG5PTw6I0+WLOIYCFnQeawCgx6pa
ympR6Hav3Atvy26ADtYeWKU=
=Gd7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--