@dholbach: The upstream bug is here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2577889&group_id=108839&atid=651633
Now, the problem is that the patch that was applied upstream isn't the same that was applied by us.
Citation from From bug 327664:
"on a second thought, field width 4 "%4.1fG" is more proper than my previous one "%3.1fG", so new patch"
but the patch that was send, and has been applied by upstream developer uses "%3.1fG" and not "%4.1fG"
Unfortunately neither do I have a system with enough ram to test if fix is working nor do I have time to investigate it further in following days :/
@dholbach: The upstream bug is here: http:// sourceforge. net/tracker/ index.php? func=detail& aid=2577889& group_id= 108839& atid=651633
Now, the problem is that the patch that was applied upstream isn't the same that was applied by us.
Citation from From bug 327664:
"on a second thought, field width 4 "%4.1fG" is more proper than my previous one "%3.1fG", so new patch"
but the patch that was send, and has been applied by upstream developer uses "%3.1fG" and not "%4.1fG"
Unfortunately neither do I have a system with enough ram to test if fix is working nor do I have time to investigate it further in following days :/