nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Dell Mini Project |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
gvfs |
Fix Released
|
High
|
|||
gvfs (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs | ||
Hardy |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Steve Langasek | ||
Intrepid |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs | ||
Jaunty |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs | ||
nautilus (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Low
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs | ||
Hardy |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs | ||
Intrepid |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Jaunty |
Invalid
|
Low
|
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: nautilus
Using hardy beta, when I browse with nautilus other machines in an Active Directory (ADS) network, some of them do not show their shared folders.
The ADS integration of the hardy box was done using winbind, kerberos and PAM libraries, essentially as described here:
https:/
The network contains mostly windows clients, but also several linux boxes, which were joined to the ADS domain with the command: 'net ads join'.
Machines running windows XP, windows 2003 and samba show '0 objects' in nautilus, but after inserting the complete path (eg.: smb://server/share) the folders can be accessed after the password prompt.
Machines running windows 2000 show their folders regularly.
Here is a detailed description of what happens:
Case 1 -------
Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running ubuntu-gutsy server.
In a terminal window:
renbag@vm-hardy:~$ smbclient -L gutsy-server
Password: (password inserted here)
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
IPC$ IPC IPC Service (gutsy-server (Samba 3.0.26a, Ubuntu))
share Disk gutsy-server_share
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a]
In Nautilus:
Open Network --> Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) --> All machines are displayed;
Double-click on the 'gutsy-server' icon --> after a while, Nautilus returns '0 objects', without asking for a password;
Insert the full address (smb://
Case 2 -------
Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows XP
In a terminal window:
renbag@vm-hardy:~$ smbclient -L XP-ACQ
Password: (password inserted here)
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
IPC$ IPC Remote IPC
Data Disk
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
In Nautilus:
Same behaviour as in case 1.
smb://XP-ACQ --> '0 objects';
smb://XP-ACQ/Data --> content displayed after password.
Case 3 -------
Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows 2000
In a terminal window:
renbag@vm-hardy:~$ smbclient -L TF-2000
Password: (password inserted here)
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
IPC$ IPC Remote IPC
Data Disk
Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
In Nautilus:
Open Network --> Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) --> All machines are displayed;
Double-click on the 'TF-2000' icon --> All the shared folders are displayed, without asking for a password;
Double-click on the 'Data' folder icon --> a password is requested and the content is displayed.
(This is the correct and the expected behaviour).
Using ubuntu-gutsy boxes, with exactly the same samba configuration (smb.conf), to browse the same machines I never observed Nautilus return '0 objects' as in case 1 and 2.
Such a behaviour in hardy will make a normal user think that browsing an ADS network does not work at all.
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in gvfs: | |
importance: | Medium → High |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-8.04.1 |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | New → Invalid |
Changed in gvfs: | |
assignee: | nobody → desktop-bugs |
importance: | Undecided → High |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-8.04.1 |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | ubuntu-8.04.1 → none |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | ubuntu-8.04.1 → none |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-8.04.1 |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Fix Committed → In Progress |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | ubuntu-8.04.1 → none |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | Invalid → In Progress |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | In Progress → Invalid |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in gvfs: | |
assignee: | nobody → desktop-bugs |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-8.04.3 |
Changed in nautilus: | |
status: | Invalid → Confirmed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
tags: | removed: verification-done |
tags: |
added: regression-proposed verification-failed removed: verification-needed |
Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy): | |
milestone: | ubuntu-8.04.3 → none |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-8.04.3 |
Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy): | |
assignee: | Sebastien Bacher (seb128) → Steve Langasek (vorlon) |
milestone: | ubuntu-8.04.3 → ubuntu-8.04.4 |
Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
tags: | removed: qa-jaunty-desktop regression-proposed verification-failed |
tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-needed |
Changed in gvfs: | |
importance: | Unknown → High |
I have the Exact same Problem.