(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #16)
> (In reply to eggert from comment #15)
> > glibc bug 11053 is fixed,
>
> Shouldn't this bug be resolved as fixed, then?
OK, done.
> > Perhaps a better match for
> > Debian bug 884075 is glibc bug 10844.
>
> It seems different.
In that case it might be better to file a new glibc bug report, one that corresponds more closely to Debian bug 884075.
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #16)
> (In reply to eggert from comment #15)
> > glibc bug 11053 is fixed,
>
> Shouldn't this bug be resolved as fixed, then?
OK, done.
> > Perhaps a better match for
> > Debian bug 884075 is glibc bug 10844.
>
> It seems different.
In that case it might be better to file a new glibc bug report, one that corresponds more closely to Debian bug 884075.