No, the wireless network is what I was talking about. The local
interface would have been running.
I'm happy with it now. If you want to close it be my guest.
Thanks.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:57 +0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> it's possible that it was not catching up if started before the network
> as suggested by a previous comment, you wrote that the issue is fixed
> with dapper, the bug can be closed then?
>
--
Kenneth P. Turvey <email address hidden>
Home: (618) 416-1200
No, the wireless network is what I was talking about. The local
interface would have been running.
I'm happy with it now. If you want to close it be my guest.
Thanks.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:57 +0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> it's possible that it was not catching up if started before the network
> as suggested by a previous comment, you wrote that the issue is fixed
> with dapper, the bug can be closed then?
>
--
Kenneth P. Turvey <email address hidden>
Home: (618) 416-1200
XMPP IM: <email address hidden>
Yahoo IM: kpturvey2