About the private capability, it is named "private" because it hasn't yet been discussed on the FD.o list. It should be renamed to something more appropriate once this actually becomes a standard. For the moment, it is our proposal, and I thought it would have been worse to call it a standard capability where it is not the case yet.
Thanks for the Jaunty patch James.
About the private capability, it is named "private" because it hasn't yet been discussed on the FD.o list. It should be renamed to something more appropriate once this actually becomes a standard. For the moment, it is our proposal, and I thought it would have been worse to call it a standard capability where it is not the case yet.