On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Andrew Conkling <email address hidden> wrote:
> When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate > once it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :) >
Especially since bug 214079 seems to be missing a valid backtrace.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Andrew Conkling <email address hidden>
wrote:
> When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate
> once it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :)
>
Especially since bug 214079 seems to be missing a valid backtrace.